Moon ,Sun, And Mechanism Of Social Relations

I just opened my laptop and youtube sang of power relations for long period with several meanings.The idea of power seems widespread, but in some scholarly circles especially in the social sciences, it is a word that is highly ambiguous with more connotation than real meaning.Power relations are relationships in which one person has social-formative power over another, and is able to get the other person to do what they wish (whether by compelling obedience or in some less compulsive and even a more subtle way.I asked my momma about the  existence of moon and sun .She started the relationship of moon and sun with mechanism.Both the sun and the moon serve as bases for systems of time measurement. The moon is the Earth’s only natural satellite and is the basis of the month on modern calendars. The moon takes 27.3 days to fully rotate around the earth. The sun, around which the Earth orbits, is the basis of the calendar year and day. The sun itself rotates within a period of about 25 days.

I was surprised and started google serfing about mechanics.The adjective‘social’ is redundant. Accordingly, computational mechanisms of interaction are conceived of as a special category of mechanisms of interaction that is character-ized by a specific allocation of functionality between human actors and artifact.The purpose of networking sites is to let users organize their network connections (by creating profiles and linking to profiles of others), discovering new possible ties in the process and recovering connections to old-time friends or other relations. The functionality imitates the local search process of real social networks (by letting users browse the friendship network) and relies on the high clustering of social networks (the friends of our friends are likely to be friends as well). The importance of social relationships alone suggests that they should be treated on the first-order. Social relations are (mostly binary) predicates, their instances being the concrete relations among the participants of the relationship. Social relations are also socially-constructed objects in the sense of Masolo et al. Much like social roles, social relationships have a strong contextual dependence in that they own their definition (the ability to identify them) to the social context in which they are interpretable.